RV College of Engineering · 2024 + 2025

RVCE Change of Branch — the 2024 and 2025 record

Two years, 216 applicants, 88 moves. The outcome tables, the observed CGPA range, every aggregate movement — and why vacancy arithmetic mattered more than any marks target.

124→502024 applied → moved
92→382025 applied → moved
6.43lowest observed, 2024
0successful with backlog

Aggregates credited to the student-built RVCE Branch Change Portal.

01 · THE TWO YEARS

Where the seats actually were

Inflow per branch — the single chart that explains both years. In 2024 the moves spread across twelve departments; in 2025 they collapsed into ECE, ETE and EEE, and the entire CS family took five.

2024 · 50 MOVES

CSE5
ISE4
CSE (Data Science)1
ECE3
CSE (Cyber Security)5
CSE (AI & ML)9
ETE7
IEM2
EEE3
EIE7
Civil1
Mechanical3

2025 · 38 MOVES

CSE (Data Science)2
CSE (AI)3
ECE9
ETE10
EEE10
IEM2
Mechanical2

ECE, ETE and EEE took 29 of the 38 successful moves in 2025. CSE core took zero — at any CGPA. That asymmetry is the whole story of this page, and it is a vacancy outcome, not a marks bar.

02 · THE TABLES

The full allotment record

Every branch, both years. 'Seats vacant' stays visibly 'not published' — inflow is not a vacancy count, and RVCE does not publish the vacancy table.

RVCE 2024 — 124 applied, 50 got a branch (40.3%)

Branch moved intoSeats vacantGot inLowest observed CGPALeft branch
CSEnot published59.850
ISEnot published49.680
CSE (Data Science)not published19.651
ECEnot published39.532
CSE (Cyber Security)not published59.453
CSE (AI & ML)not published99.184
ETEnot published78.705
IEMnot published28.604
EEEnot published38.337
EIEnot published77.955
Civilnot published16.882
Mechanicalnot published36.4310
Chemicalnot published05
Aerospacenot published02

These are the lowest CGPAs observed in RVCE's allotment lists for those years. They are not cutoffs — neither VTU nor RVCE publishes cutoffs. A branch with four seats and four strong applicants produces a high number that predicts nothing about next year. Compiled from publicly available allotment lists; no student names or USNs are reproduced.

RVCE 2025 — 92 applied, 38 got a branch (41.3%)

Branch moved intoSeats vacantGot inLowest observed CGPALeft branch
CSE (Data Science)not published29.730
CSE (AI)not published39.700
ECEnot published99.584
ETEnot published108.956
EEEnot published108.205
IEMnot published28.157
Mechanicalnot published27.337
CSE (core)not published00
ISEnot published00
Civilnot published05
Chemicalnot published03
Biotechnot published01

These are the lowest CGPAs observed in RVCE's allotment lists for those years. They are not cutoffs — neither VTU nor RVCE publishes cutoffs. A branch with four seats and four strong applicants produces a high number that predicts nothing about next year. Compiled from publicly available allotment lists; no student names or USNs are reproduced.

03 · THE CGPA RECORD

What CGPA actually got in

The band runs from the lowest to the highest CGPA observed among successful applicants; the marker is the mean. Across both years, every single successful student had zero backlogs.

SUCCESSFUL-APPLICANT CGPA RANGE
2024 · 50 moves6.439.9
2025 · 38 moves7.339.95
6.07.08.09.010.0

Band shows lowest to highest CGPA observed among successful applicants; the marker is the mean. Observed values from public allotment lists — not thresholds.

That last point is the cleanest warning on this page for an applicant with a backlog. The regulation can place an eligible backlog student on the list — below every all-clear student — and in both observed years the process ended before any backlog applicant received a move.

But do not over-read the top end either: a 9.00+ CGPA was no guarantee. CSE core accepted nobody in the 2025 record. Vacancy and preference order decide what a strong CGPA can reach.

31/502024 successful at 9.00+
25/382025 successful at 9.00+
19/502024 successful below 9.00
13/382025 successful below 9.00

04 · THE EXPLANATION

Why CSE took nobody in 2025

It was not a higher bar. It was intake restructuring meeting the vacancy formula.

The 2025 record shows zero students moving into CSE core. Under VTU's formula, that means no clear CSE vacancy was available to operate — not that some CGPA line was announced.

RVCE was simultaneously restructuring its computing intake: the official 2025 mandatory disclosure records the programme/intake changes used here. ISE moved to zero intake with closure applied for, EIE was absent from the intake list, CSE rose from 285 to 360 seats, and AI & ML from 120 to 180.

A closed first-year intake creates no third-semester cohort two semesters later — but it does not automatically create a CSE seat either. CSE still needs its own clear vacancy after Reg and Rep are counted. The 2025 pattern — five moves inside the CS family, 29 into ECE/ETE/EEE — is what that arithmetic produced.

A realistic preference list follows the vacancies of that year, not a previous year's observed number. Try the arithmetic yourself on the hub's seat-map calculator.

V = I − (REG + REP)
2025 intake shifts at RVCECSE 285 → 360 · AI&ML 120 → 180 · ISE → 0 (closure applied) · EIE → not listed
ConsequenceISE and EIE admitted no first-year cohort — no 3rd-sem vacancy chain could form there
Observed resultISE inflow 0 · CSE core inflow 0 · five CS-family moves total

Intake shifts from the researched AICTE approval record and RVCE fee circulars; observed inflows from the public allotment lists.

05 · WHO MOVED WHERE

Every aggregate movement

Branch-to-branch paths, both years. Codes follow the source portal's labels. Both sets reconcile exactly to their year totals.

2024 · 50 MOVEMENTS

CY→CSE 2AIML→CSE 2CD→CSE 1CY→ISE 1AS→ISE 1AIML→ISE 2ETE→ECE 1EIE→ECE 1EEE→ECE 1ME→CD 1ECE→CY 1CV→CY 1EEE→CY 2CH→CY 1EIE→AIML 2ME→AIML 3ETE→AIML 2EEE→AIML 2EIE→ETE 2ME→ETE 3IEM→ETE 1EEE→ETE 1ECE→IEM 1ETE→IEM 1CH→EIE 1ME→EIE 2IEM→EIE 2CV→EIE 1EEE→EIE 1ME→EEE 1IEM→EEE 1AS→EEE 1CH→ME 3ETE→CV 1

2025 · 38 MOVEMENTS

EC→CI 2CV→CI 1EC→CD 2ME→EC 2ET→EC 6EE→EC 1IM→ET 3ME→ET 2EE→ET 4CH→ET 1CV→EE 3ME→EE 3IM→EE 4BT→IM 1CH→IM 1CV→ME 1CH→ME 1

Per-branch applicant and first-preference counts are intentionally omitted — the available extraction of those failed its own checksum and remains unverified.

06 · THE RVCE OVERLAY

RVCE ran its own timeline

About a month behind VTU, with an offline counselling round the university regulation does not contain — something an autonomous college can add. Highlighted cells are where RVCE diverged.

VTU 2024 scheduleRVCE actual record
Applications open05-09-202405-09-2024
Student deadline22-09-2024 (revised)22-09-2024
Merit list03-10-202408-10-2024
Offline counsellingnot in VTU process09-10-2024
Fee payment07-10-2024 · ₹7,500 stage12-11-2024 · ₹9,000
Final list14-10-202413-11-2024

The ₹9,000 RVCE fee stage was ₹900 above VTU's ₹600 + ₹7,500 standard total. What the difference covered was not published anywhere.

RVCE's public higher-semester circular index does not expose its branch-change notices — they go out through the internal SAP portal. That is exactly why this process is hard to follow from the college website alone: watch both the VTU deadline and RVCE's internal communication.

EXPECT NOVEMBER

If the pattern holds, RVCE's internal process — counselling, fee stage, final list — runs into November, a month after VTU's schedule. The university deadline still governs your application.

07 · TUITION AFTER A MOVE

The fee treatment depends on your admission route

Government-route fee schedules are category-based; RVCE's management fee circular is branch-wise. The missing piece is the one a branch-change student needs most: RVCE does not publish a re-billing rule after a successful move.

CETroute/category fee schedule
COMEDKnotified route fee schedule
MQbranch-wise official circular
Unknownre-billing after a branch change

The current official RVCE management-quota circular demonstrates that management tuition is branch-wise. It does not explain what happens when an already-enrolled student changes branch.

DO NOT ASSUME THE OLD FEE FOLLOWS YOU

Ask RVCE accounts for written treatment before accepting a move. Until RVCE publishes a rule, any exact re-billing claim would be an estimate.

08 · HOW TO USE THIS

What an RVCE applicant should actually do

  1. Start with eligibility, not a branch target. Confirm first-year results and the current annual notice — every observed successful student was all-clear.
  2. Ask the academic section for the vacancy statement. Last year's inflow cannot substitute for this year's Reg, Rep and intake calculation.
  3. Build an order you would genuinely accept. The change cannot be reversed. Include ECE, ETE, EEE or a core branch only if you want that curriculum.
  4. Watch both deadlines — VTU's application window and RVCE's internal communication.
  5. Get fee treatment in writing if your admission category has branch-wise tuition.
  6. Stay in your current branch's classes until VTU announces the final list.

The conversion rates look stable — 40.3% then 41.3% — but they are descriptions of two completed lists, not individual probabilities. Preferences, vacancies and competing applicants are recalculated from scratch every year.

09 · QUICK ANSWERS

RVCE branch-change FAQs

How many RVCE students got a branch change in 2025?
The publicly available 2025 allotment record shows 38 successful changes from 92 applicants, or 41.3%.
What was the lowest observed CGPA at RVCE?
The lowest CGPA observed among successful students was 6.43 in the 2024 allotment list, for Mechanical. It was 7.33 in 2025. These are historical observations, not thresholds for a future year.
Why did RVCE CSE take no students in 2025?
The record shows no CSE inflow. Intake restructuring meant branches that had stopped first-year admission could not create the third-semester vacancy chain students expected. It was a vacancy outcome, not proof of a higher CGPA bar.
Can an RVCE student with a backlog get a branch change?
The 2020 base rule places eligible backlog students below all-clear students, while the latest annual notices required all first-year subjects to be passed. In the 2024 and 2025 RVCE successful records, none of the 88 successful students had a backlog.
Does RVCE charge the same as VTU?
Not in the 2024 record. RVCE’s process record shows ₹9,000 at fee-payment stage, while VTU’s standard 2024 notice listed ₹600 application plus ₹7,500 after recommendation. RVCE did not publish what the difference covered.

PRIMARY RECORD

Sources

Last verified against VTU circular 3148 on 27-08-2026

Found a source mismatch? Report a correction on WhatsApp.

Ask about VTU branch change